- Daily & Weekly newsletters
- Buy & download The Bulletin
- Comment on our articles
More violent protests against Good Move traffic plans for Brussels
Brussels’ traffic plan Good Move, which aims to adjust traffic routes and lower the amount of polluting vehicles in the city in an effort to combat high air pollution and traffic jams, has prompted violent resistance from some in the Belgian capital.
Protests in the municipality of Schaerbeek turned violent and disorderly, with two police officers and a firefighter injured as a result. Protestors illegally removed new traffic barriers that are part of the Good Move changes.
Schaerbeek councillor Vincent Vanhaleweyn (Ecolo) told RTL that while they are “not giving into violence”, the municipality are hearing that “a part of the population that was extremely angry and [we are] going to sit down with them to find solutions”.
But it remains unclear how many of these protestors were actually local residents affected by the changes.
“I didn't recognise anyone from our neighbourhood,” one resident told Bruzz.
“They are opponents of the Good Move plan who don't live here, but still make themselves heard. They are supported by the [political parties] MR, PS and PVDA/PTB, who were also present. And the municipality is not punishing them for their actions.”
The resident, who has lived in the neighbourhood for five years, said most of the locals do indeed support the plan, as traffic congestion makes the neighbourhood feel “unliveable” and the area is plagued with “road pirates” - or people who drive at incredibly high rates of speed, sometimes racing one another.
The protestors against Good Move have been described as aggressive and violent in how they voice their opposition, and the second-consecutive demonstration in Schaerbeek got particularly out of hand.
“These events are intolerable,” Brussels mobility minister Elke Van den Brandt (Groen) told Radio 1.
“It's a form of vindictiveness and vandalism that cannot be legitimised.”
Another minister was threatened with physical violence by a member of the public during a council meeting last month over her support for the plan. The person who threatened her was part of a crowd of men making threats and shouting over the meeting until it was forced to be adjourned.
Local authorities agreed to put the plan on hold for a few months in order to facilitate a dialogue between those opposed and those who support it. But Van den Brandt emphasises that this cannot include violent protests.
“The citizens have concerns,” she said. “But this cannot justify any violence. We cannot accept that groups abuse legitimate discontent to use violence.”
Many of those opposed to the plan are vehicle owners concerned about changes to traffic patterns that would inconvenience them, or having to pay additional taxes for owning multiple polluting vehicles in a city already jam-packed with cars and plagued with some of the worst traffic congestion of any major European city.
Others are concerned that changes to historic public spaces are significant ones that threaten Brussels’ cultural heritage.
But supporters of the plan point out that it is driven by a desire to improve both public health and public safety. Brussels air pollution far exceeds World Health Organisation standards, including around schools and playgrounds. Nine Belgians have even sued over it, most of them having developed respiratory issues as a result of the poor air quality.
Van den Brandt said that a real effort was made to communicate the plan to the public ahead of time, a plan that “was worked on for two years”.
But, the minister said, given the intense public reaction, "we can only conclude that more work is needed".